Rome Didn't Fall in A Day.









Objective Truth Exists and is Accessible to Everyone.

All Human Problems can be Solved with Enough Knowledge, Wealth, Social Cooperation and Time.


Photo: Rusty Peak, Anchorage, Alaska


Translate

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Forecasting the 2014 Ebola Outbreak; Update #2

April 29, 2015
My latest update regarding the history of the Ebola epidemic can be found here:
http://dougrobbins.blogspot.com/2015/04/ro-and-history-of-ebola-epidemic-in.html
-------
December 17, 2014: 
The exponential growth rate of the Ebola epidemic continued for about two months after my original blog post in August, 2014.  The exponential trend was broken in mid-October, 2014, thanks to global relief efforts and effective public health programs in the affected countries.  Updates to my original charts can be found here:
-----
There is no clear end-point to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.  The Ebola outbreak in West Africa, now involves about 9000 reported cases, with the likelihood of an equal number of unreported cases (10/17 update).   Like ripples from a stone thrown into the water, the epidemic has the potential to infect heavily populated areas of west Africa, to spread across porous borders by people fleeing the epidemic, and to jump from large cities to other large cities. The following figure shows a timeline extrapolated from the exponential growth of the disease, and marked by points representing populations at risk.  Africa is impoverished and lacks the resources to maintain a stringent defense against the epidemic.  There are no firebreaks, and the world will be able to do very little to stop a general pandemic if the case numbers continue to grow well into the coming year.

Reports from the World Health Organization (WHO) are increasingly bleak.  The WHO October 8th situation report states:

” …the situation in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone continues to deteriorate, with widespread and persistent transmission of EVD [Ebola Virus Disease]….the reported fall in the number of new cases in Liberia over the past three weeks is unlikely to be genuine.  Rather, it reflects a deterioration in the ability of overwhelmed responders to record accurate epidemiological data….There is no evidence that the EVD epidemic in West Africa is being brought under control….”

The international community is increasing support to the affected countries.  New teams and equipment are being sent from the United States, Great Britain, Cuba and Nigeria, among others.  However, the scale and speed of the intervention appears too little and too late.   At this point, we have to ask where this epidemic is going, and when will it get there.

This is the third post on the topic of Ebola on this blog.  The first two are here:
Course of the Epidemic
We can consider the future course of the epidemic by linking our charts of case numbers to the geographical distribution of actual populations.  Here is a map of Africa showing population density. 

The colored outlines show populations which might be at risk if the epidemic spreads across Africa.   For illustrative purposes, these populations are linked to the extrapolation of the cumulative number of cases, using a contagion model with Ro = 1.63.   In this model, each case of Ebola infects (on average) 1.63 new victims after a transmission and incubation period of 16 days.  This model fits the reported exponential growth of the disease to date.
A number of cases can be expected in developed countries as a result of infected individuals traveling to new countries.  The United States and Spain have already seen such cases and subsequent secondary infections.  However, rich countries with well-developed medical systems should be able to easily quell the epidemic, given only a few points of infection.  

The Ebola epidemic is much more likely to spread through the impoverished nations of Sub-Saharan Africa.   By the numbers, at the established rate of growth would spread the epidemic to every individual in Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia, totaling 21 million people, by the mid-year 2015.  The epidemic could spread to every individual in West Africa, 412 million people, by autumn 2015.  By year-end 2015, the epidemic could spread to nearly a billion people in Sub-Saharan Africa by year-end 2015, showing the astonishing power of exponential growth.

Of course, the epidemic will not unfold as a neat mathematical formula.  There are factors which will impede the growth of the disease.  And there are factors which may accelerate the spread of the disease.  As the rate of infection rises in a population, several things may happen.  Some of these things will reduce the transmission of disease, and some things will increase the transmission of disease.  In affected populations, intense public health campaigns are being conducted, which should reduce risky behaviors and reduce the rate of infection.  Also, as the infected population approaches saturation, the rate of new infections should decline.  On the other hand, high infection rates will strain the fabric of society, overwhelm treatment facilities, and reduce the number of qualified professionals working to contain the epidemic.  And perhaps worst for the rest of the world, at some point large numbers of Ebola refugees will flee infected countries and carry the disease to new places.

Liberia Case Count
Recent data reported by the World Health Organization seem to show a slower rate of growth than in the earlier history of the epidemic.  However, there is serious doubt about the accuracy of recent reports, particularly from Liberia.  The October 8th report from WHO bluntly states “Evidence obtained from responders and laboratory staff in the country indicates beyond doubt that there is widespread under-reporting of new cases, and that the situation in Liberia, and in Monrovia in particular, continues to deteriorate from week to week.”

The number of new cases appears to be declining; but this is unlikely to be true considering other evidence.

Since early September, reports from the Liberian Ministry of Health have been late, contradictory, and inconsistent.  The most recent reports from Monrovia and Freetown still indicate that all isolation units and hospitals are full, and that patients are turned away to transmit the disease at home or in the streets.  Although we can hope that public health measures are reducing the rate of transmission, we are in a state of uncertainty, without reliable numbers to support that conclusion.   

Adequate medical facilities are necessary to measuring the development of the epidemic.  If families of Ebola patients believe that they will receive treatment, patients will be brought to medical facilities, and data gathered about the progress of the disease.  If patients are consistently turned away from treatment facilities, there is no point to bringing stricken people to the clinics.   For the past two months, the number of beds in Ebola clinics in Liberia has been only about 20 % to 25 % of the number needed.   Some 75% to 80% of Ebola patients have been turned away, or left to suffer in the streets.  In this environment, it is understandable that families do not seek official care, but instead choose to care for loved ones at home.  This means that official figures no longer have any validity in measuring the epidemic, and virtually guarantees the spread of the disease. 

Ebola Clinic Beds
Specialized treatment centers are necessary for Ebola patients.  Without proper equipment and training, medical personnel are at tremendous risk of contracting the disease.  [As of October 8th, 416 healthcare workers have contracted the disease, and 233 have died.]  But throughout the epidemic, the number of beds in proper treatment centers has lagged far behind the need.   According to WHO, throughout the months of September and October, the number of beds available to patients has been about 25% of the number needed.

In the 8th October report, WHO indicates that there are about 1100 beds available to Ebola patients in qualified treatment centers.  The current need is for over 4300 patients, a shortfall of 3200 beds.   There is adequate care for only 25% of the patients.

The United States and Britain have mobilized military resources to fight the epidemic.   The United States will build and staff treatment centers containing 1700 beds in Liberia, while the British army will build and staff treatment centers containing 700 beds in Sierra Leone.  Both programs will require about 60 days for implementation. This effort will still leave a shortfall of 800 beds, according to current needs.  It is likely that other organizations will also contribute new beds, and perhaps bring the total number of beds to 4300 by the end of November.  

The problem is the human tendency for linear thinking, whereas problems in nature are generally exponential.  By my estimates, the Ebola epidemic is doubling about every twenty-nine days.  (The CDC calculates the epidemic is doubling every 20 days, by assuming a large number of unreported cases).   In 60 days, the epidemic will have grown four-fold.   In mid-September, when the US Army intervention was announced, about 1800 new beds were needed, for a total of 2425 beds.  If the epidemic continues to grow exponentially, by mid-November about 10,000 beds will be needed. 

Death Rate
In my first post, I noted that diseases evolve quickly, and that evolution causes the disease to become more contagious, and less deadly.  Living patients propagate the virus better than dead patients.  As expected, the mortality rate for Ebola patients appears to be falling, from about 70 percent to about 55 percent.
The chart shows cumulative reported deaths as a fraction of cumulative reported cases, with a lag of eight days.  I would like to calculate a daily death rate (an instantaneous function), but the official figures are reported too sporadically for a meaningful chart. 

Future Course of the Epidemic
The equation used by epidemiologists to forecast an epidemic looks like this:
Cumulative Cases = ((Ro/1+d)t)t
The term “d” is a decay parameter, which reduces the rate of transmission over time.  This could represent effective medical intervention, or a public awareness campaign, or disease saturation within the population at risk.  We might hope that the declining number of reported new cases in Liberia reflects a real decline in new infections, but all other evidence indicates that the people of Liberia increasingly distrust the official treatment centers, and no longer bring patients to be counted.

We might also consider a parameter which increases the rate of transmission over time.  Such a parameter might represent breakdown of social order, growing distrust of medical facilities, or dispersion of the population fleeing the epidemic.  In any event, the data quantifying the epidemic are now uncertain, and there is little basis for assigning values to parameters which may reduce or increase the rate of transmission. 

While we must make every effort to stop Ebola within the current area of active transmission, we should also realistically consider what will happen if those efforts fail.  It is likely that neighboring nations will receive refugees through porous borders, and some of those refugees will carry the virus.   Ebola can be expected to spread along the West African coast through coastal communities, and jump from infected large cities to other large cities.  Like ripples from a stone thrown in the water, Ebola has the potential to expand through heavily populated West Africa, and ultimately affect the entire continent.  At some point, perhaps at 20,000 active cases, or 100,000 active cases, the disease will not be stoppable with the procedures that ended previous epidemics.   According to the rate of growth and the distribution of African population, the 2nd half of 2015 may be a very bad time for Africa.

Some people do survive Ebola, and they are surviving in increasing numbers.  This shows that the human organism can mount an effective immune response to Ebola.  Medical science has developed vaccines for other deadly viruses.  It is inevitable that an effective vaccine will ultimately be developed and produced on a large scale.  The question is how soon the vaccine can be produced and brought to protect the people at risk.

In considering the impact of the Ebola epidemic, I am strangely reminded of something a colleague said to me on the morning of 9/11/2001.  The second plane had just struck the World Trade Center.   Being quicker and brighter than me, she turned and said, “You realize, nothing will ever be the same again”.  Of course, I had not realized the impact of the event, and didn’t fully understand until several years later.  In the same way, something with global impact has happened in West Africa.  The world does not yet realize that everything has changed, and nothing will ever be the same again. 
 ------
*  Cumulative Cases = ((Ro/1+d)t)t
 I used a simpler exponential function for my first model, and a simple rolling formula in Excel to create my contagion model with Ro.  In the equation shown, one “t” must represent the time between initial and subsequent infection, and the second “t” must indicate the life of the epidemic.  I will update this post after I have some time to play with the equation.
-----
Obsolete as of November 7, 2014, see latest post

Chart Updates to my original post, using the original extrapolations.
In the October 29 report, WHO presents revised figures that add about 3700 cases to the previous total.  These cases were recognized through study of patient databases, and occurred throughout the epidemic period, and not only since October 22.  The additional cases return the cumulative case number to my original exponential extrapolation, first presented on August 26th.

It is uncertain whether the apparent flattening of the cumulative cases, observed through the month of October, is real or the result of under-reporting.  Case reporting is increasingly late, and WHO cites data missing for a number of dates. 

I have now seen two anecdotal reports that give a more optimistic appraisal of the situation in Monrovia, indicating fewer patients are reporting to Ebola clinics, and fewer bodies are being collected from the city outside the clinics.  Authorities disagree on whether the drop in patients shows a real decline in the epidemic, or avoidance of the clinics.
New Cases (yellow circles) as of WHO Roadmap update, 10/25/2014.   Reporting dates by country are variable.
-----
References:
WHO Situation Reports, Ebola Response Roadmap

Ebola disease outbreak news

Population, Landscape, and Climate Estimates, v3: Population Density 2010, Africa
National Aggregates of Geospatial Data Collection

It = ((Ro/1+d)t)t   where is scaled in generation time, with Rthe basic reproductive number, and d a “control parameter” that causes incidence to decay. 



October 12, 2014
Personal report by Drew Hinshaw, WSJ, on awful situation in Monrovia.   Patients now told to stay at home; families told to leave patients alone.  Increasing numbers of patients on street, as compared to several weeks ago.   Mobs of people moving on streets; people trying to leave.

US military intervention to fight Ebola; commitment of 3000 soldiers and 1700 beds.

UK commits to building five treatment facilities with 700 beds in Sierra Leone.  Estimated to allow treatment of 8800 patients over six months.

Lots of facts about Ebola.

Lots of numbers and graphics showing that the global response will never catch up with the epidemic.

Infographic showing the rate of increase in cases over two months, and the number of beds available for treatment.   Also shows the US commitment to build additional beds over the next two months, which will provide about 1.5% of the needed beds in November.

Public education programs to convince population that Ebola is real; overflowing clinics; people touching and praying over Ebola patient.

Ebola is transmitted even under stringent conditions of containment.



Monday, September 15, 2014

Ebola Update #1

April 29, 2015
My latest update regarding the history of the Ebola epidemic can be found here:
http://dougrobbins.blogspot.com/2015/04/ro-and-history-of-ebola-epidemic-in.html
------
Ebola Update #1
The first post in this series provided a projection of the growth of the Ebola epidemic, if the disease is not effectively contained.   Two methods were used to make a mathematical fit to the data and extrapolate the cumulative number of cases.  Extrapolation of the current trend shows that massive numbers of people could become infected in a short period of time.  The cumulative number of cases is doubling every month.  If the epidemic continues to grow at the same mathematical rate, one million people could become infected by April 2015.  Further extrapolation would pass one billion cases in the fall of 2015 to early 2016.
-----
December 17, 2014: 
The exponential growth rate of the Ebola epidemic continued for about two months after my original blog post.  The exponential trend was broken in mid-October, 2014, thanks to global relief efforts and effective public health programs in the affected countries.  Updates to my original charts can be found here:
-----
This post will look at new data and efforts to contain the epidemic.  The World Health Organization (WHO) is monitoring the situation, publishing periodic updates, and developing strategies for containing the epidemic.  Since my first post on this topic, the cumulative number of cases and deaths reported by WHO has generally matched the exponential projections. 
As the epidemic grows and social order breaks down in affected areas, data is likely to become less complete and more uncertain, limiting what can be done with analytical tools.

Extrapolation Method #1: Exponential Regression
A regression through the data is easily performed in Excel.   The data chosen begins on May 23, at a point where about 10 new cases were appearing every day, and the number of cumulative cases showed steady exponential growth.   The original regression through the data resulted in the following formula, counting days from May 23, 2014:
Number of Cases = 285.6e(0.0239 * number of days

A regression including the new data changes the exponent only slightly, to e(0.0248 * number of days), and changes the date for 1 million cases from April 29th to April 17th.
Extrapolation Method #2: Contagion Model
In the original model, each infection is assumed to lead to 1.31 subsequent infections, following a lag of eight days.   New data is still a good fit to this trend.

After some thought and reading, I realized that I neglected the incubation period in defining the contagion model.  A better model would assume that the subsequent infection would occur after about 8 days of the original case diagnosis.   An additional 8 days should be required for the incubation period of subsequent cases.   I changed the model to a 16 day interval between diagnosis of the initial case and subsequent cases, and fit the data by changing Ro from 1.31 to 1.63.   The new model is in close agreement with the first method, an exponential regression to the data.

Containment Efforts
The WHO is coordinating efforts to contain the epidemic.  On the 28th of August, the WHO issued a report as a roadmap to the containment effort.  At the time, 3069 cases of Ebola had been reported in West Africa.  The report acknowledges that in some areas, the actual number of cases may be 2 to 4 times the number of reported cases.

This WHO roadmap outlined procedures for containing the outbreak, defined roles for coordination of relief efforts, defined metrics for success, and specified the budget necessary to perform the work.  A total budget of $490 million was requested.

This report forecast that as many as 20,000 cases might occur, and that six to nine months might be required for eradication of the outbreak.   No processes or programs are identified in the event that the success metrics are not met.

Containment Procedures
The process employed by WHO in West Africa is the same process used successfully to combat previous Ebola outbreaks.   The process is straightforward, but labor-intensive.  Treatment centers are established for confirmed cases of Ebola, and isolation centers are established to evaluate suspected cases.  When cases are confirmed, patients are transferred to the treatment centers.  Patients suspected of having an Ebola infection are interviewed, to determine what other people they might have infected.  All of their contacts are monitored for 21 days.  For the WHO planning document, each patient was assumed to have 10 contacts which need to be monitored.   Further, for each 70 bed hospital, about 200 to 250 staff are required to care for the patients.

Clearly, as the number of Ebola cases rises, the ability to contain the epidemic becomes more strained.  As the disease grows exponentially, the required staffing also grows exponentially.  The current rate of new cases is about 140 new cases daily, as of September 13.   This implies 1400 new contacts, each day, which must be monitored for 21 days.  Over the next few weeks, there will be 30,000 to 45,000 new contacts who must be monitored for signs of the disease.  The September 12th update to the WHO Roadmap acknowledges that the capacity for contact tracing in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone is under extreme pressure.  The capacity to perform safe burials is also under stress.
Complicating the problem of obtaining sufficient staff to treat the epidemic are the grim statistics for health care workers.  As of September 7th, 301 health care workers had contracted Ebola, and 144 have already died.

I am uncertain of the status of funding for the WHO roadmap.  President Obama requested $88 million from Congress to contribute to the containment effort, but Congressional leaders approved only $40 million.   Philanthropist Bill Gates gave $50 million to various agencies, and his former business partner Paul Allen donated $9 million, in addition to $2.8 million he gave last month.   The US Department of Defense, in a statement pathetically detached from reality, promised to construct a 25-bed field hospital, with no provision for staffing.   A spokesman later defended the offer, saying that it represented the minimum contribution which the Army might make.

As I prepared to publish this post, a new article appeared on Google News.  President Obama will visit the US Centers for Disease Control for a briefing on the Ebola outbreak.  Today, in advance of his visit, the president requested $1 billion from Congress for the US military to fight the epidemic in West Africa.

Limits to Growth
The WHO Roadmap plan seemed to offer the best hope for an early and successful resolution of the crisis, but there are already indications that the plan is failing.   Treatment centers are overwhelmed by as many as 4-times as many patients as capacity and are turning away as many patients as are being admitted.   There is no hope of containing the disease with rising numbers of Ebola carriers returning to their homes to spread the disease.

The window for successfully containing the epidemic is rapidly closing.   At some level of contagion, social order will break down entirely.  At that point, treatment of cases will become difficult or impossible; clear data about the status of the epidemic may disappear.  The problem of the epidemic will be complicated by the refugees fleeing affected areas – and possibly propagating the disease to new places.  A number of senior Liberian government officials have already fled the country.

WHO appears to have no contingency plan in the event that the August 28th Roadmap fails.  If medical intervention fails, we have to consider the natural limits to growth of the disease and the size of the population at risk.  Monrovia, capital of Liberia, is the site of most reports of inadequate medical facilities.  Monrovia has a population of 1 million within an area of 5 square miles.   On a slightly larger scale, Sierra Leone and Liberia, with a combined population of 10 million, have the greatest active transmission of disease.  The nation of Guinea is also considered by WHO as having widespread and intense transmission, bringing the potential population exposure to 21 million.  As the disease has spread along the coast, it is now active in two Liberian counties adjacent to Cote d’Ivoire.  It seems possible that Cote d’Ivoire’s population of 22 million may also be at risk.  

Considering these numbers in combination with the extrapolations above, we can make a few guesses about the future spread of the disease.  A few university scientists in the United States are beginning to talk in terms of hundreds of thousands of possible victims.  By year-end 2014, West Africa may hit a cumulative 100,000 cases, with about 30,000 active cases.  The majority of these can be expected to be in Monrovia, Liberia.  By mid-February 2015, the countries of Liberia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and possibly Cote d’Ivoire may experience a cumulative 430,000 cases, or 1% of the total population, with over 100,000 active cases.  These are the locations, the dates, and the numbers that should be used for planning the next steps in the epidemic response.  If the epidemic grows to these numbers, new processes and tactics are needed to combat the disease.

The Hot Zone
For those wishing to know more about Ebola, the best-seller “The Hot Zone”, by Richard Preston, is an informative non-fiction account of earlier Ebola outbreaks and research.  The book is tautly well-written in the style of a horror novel.  The symptoms of Ebola are described graphically, and are quite horrific.  It requires a strong stomach to read this book.

Doctors Without Borders
The relief organization “Doctors Without Borders” is one of the leading players in fighting the Ebola epidemic.  I’ve just given them a donation.

In many situations, people give money to relief organizations in response to a disaster, such as a hurricane or an earthquake.  In this situation, timely giving may help limit the scale of the disaster.

--------------
References

WHO Ebola Response Roadmap, August 28, 2014

Financing

Inadequacy of Current Response

General Facts and Graphs about Ebola

The Hot Zone
Best-selling, factual book about Ebola
Richard Preston, 1994, The Hot Zone, 300 pp., published by Random House, New York.






Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Forecasting the 2014 Ebola Outbreak

April 29, 2015
My latest update regarding the history of the Ebola epidemic can be found here:
http://dougrobbins.blogspot.com/2015/04/ro-and-history-of-ebola-epidemic-in.html
---
August 26, 2014
The number of Ebola cases is growing exponentially. Using two methods, the cumulative number of cases is extrapolated based on the growth trend of the epidemic.  If the disease continues to grow unchecked, the extrapolation shows the cumulative number of Ebola cases might grow to one million cases within six months, and one billion cases within twelve to eighteen months.
---

Forecasting the 2014 Ebola Outbreak
The Ebola outbreak in West Africa is out of control, and the magnitude of the outbreak has been underestimated.  This is according to statements from an aid organization fighting the outbreak, and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Ebola virus disease is a severe hemorrhagic fever, contagious and generally fatal.  Mortality in previous outbreaks ranged between 60% and 90%.  The contagiousness of the disease has been downplayed in the media, because Ebola is not transmitted through the air like flu or colds, but rather through direct contact with body fluids.  Nevertheless, the experience of aid workers in West Africa shows that even experienced health professionals, using best practices of isolation and decontamination, often become ill and die from the disease. 

The World Health Organization reports the number of officially diagnosed cases and deaths, while cautioning that actual numbers may be significantly higher.  As of August 20, 2014, there have been 2615 diagnosed cases and 1421 recognized deaths.  Newly diagnosed cases are now appearing at a rate of about 100 per day. 

Rate of Growth
The number of new cases (and subsequent deaths) is rising sharply.  A chart of the cumulative cases and deaths shows the characteristic curve of exponential growth. 
Chart 1
By presenting the data on a logarithmic scale, we see the data appears as a straight line, indicative of exponential growth.  The history of the outbreak seems to divide into two phases, before and after mid-May 2014.   In the early phase of the outbreak, there was apparently very rapid growth, but this probably reflects late recognition of existing cases.   The curve then flattens on the logarithmic chart, showing a measure of success in containing the disease.  In the second phase, the data corresponds more directly to a straight line on a logarithmic scale.   In this phase, the disease has escaped the control of medical isolation, and is propagating at a constant rate.
Chart 2
The growth of Ebola cases is not linear, but obeys a power law.  Mathematically, this is the same as the power law that governs the size distribution of oil fields, the magnitude of earthquakes, the severity of stock market crashes, and the lives lost in terrorist attacks.   The power law can be determined by taking an exponential regression through the growth of Ebola cases to date, which is simply done in Excel.  The equation derived by the regression is as follows, counting days from May 23, 2014:
Number of Cases = 286*e(0.0239 * number of days) 
        [Counting Days from May 23, 2014.]
Chart 3
The first method of extrapolation in this post is based on the exponential regression.  The equation can be used to extrapolate the number of cases we might expect in the future, if the rate of growth continues as in the past.  Exponential growth is sometimes startling.  If the current rate of growth continues, cumulative cases of Ebola would total one million in about eight months, near the end of April, 2015.
Chart 4
Even more startling is to continue the extrapolation.  If the rate of growth continues unchecked, the number of Ebola cases would pass the one billion mark in less than a year and a half, in February, 2016.
Chart 5
Mortality
Mortality due to Ebola virus is very high.   Death usually occurs 8 or 9 days after the onset of symptoms.  The data released by WHO necessarily contains a lag between the number of diagnosed cases and the number of deaths.  Assuming a nine-day lag, we can calculate mortality and survivorship for the cases represented in the WHO statistics.  Mortality fluctuates between 65 % and 75 %, with survivorship being the complement, ranging from 25 % to 35 %.  As noted by WHO, survivorship in the current outbreak is higher than in previous Ebola outbreaks. 
Chart 6
[Note:  The WHO website contains an erroneous calculation of survivorship, of 47%.   The figure presented by WHO appears to be the result of dividing the current number of deaths by the current number of cases (and subtracting one) without accounting for the lag between diagnosis and death.]

Contagion
I interpolated data from WHO in order to obtain a daily record of the number of cases.  The chart is shown below.  The data are noisy, but also show two phases in the progress of the outbreak.  In the initial phase, medical intervention contained the disease almost to the point of elimination.  In the subsequent phase, the number of new cases rose sharply, and continues to rise.
Chart 7
Epidemiologists use a variable, Ro, to represent the infectiousness of a disease.  This factor is the basic reproduction number, or the number of uninfected people who will catch the disease from a single infected person.   Ro for many childhood diseases is quite high; for instance, Ro for measles is 15.  Smallpox is 6, and the deadly 1918 Spanish flu was 3.  The typical seasonal flu has an Ro of only 1.2 or 1.3, but nevertheless, many, many people catch the flu.  

The other factor necessary to estimate the rate of contagion is the time between subsequent infections.  The Ro value for HIV/AIDS is 3.5, but years may pass between the initial infection and subsequent infection.  Therefore the spread of the disease is relatively slow.   For 2014 Ebola, I calculated the value of Ro, while varying the time lag until the subsequent infection.  I found the best match with a lag of 8 days, representing the time between diagnosis of the first infection and diagnosis of the second infection.  

Chart 8
The following chart represents Ro for the 2014 Ebola outbreak, assuming an 8 day lag between infections.  I have to assume that the reservoir of unreported cases is neither adding nor subtracting from the development of new cases.  For the second phase of the outbreak, represented by a straight line on the logarithmic chart, Ro has ranged from about 1.0 to 2.0.

Using a lag of 8 days between subsequent infections, I varied Ro to match the curve for the growth of new cases.   I found the best match using an Ro value of 1.31. 
Chart 9

Nate Silver, in his book “The Signal and the Noise”, cautions that early estimates of Ro are subject to large uncertainty, because of noise inherent in the data.  On the other hand, later (but more accurate) estimates of Ro are likely to be useless in preventing epidemics.  I believe my estimate of Ro = 1.31 is conservative; the 1995 outbreak of Ebola reportedly had an Ro of 1.8.

The second method of extrapolation in this post is based on a contagion model, derived from the fit to existing data.  We can use the contagion model developed with Ro to extrapolate the progress of the epidemic, to one million and one billion cases.   This model gives a more rapid growth rate to the disease.  Extrapolation of this model yields one million cases in less than six months, and one billion cases in slightly over a year from today.
Chart 10
Chart 11


Evolution
Pathogens evolve rapidly.  A small number of viruses rapidly reproduce to become billions within a single body; and the exponential increase in victims provides more orders of magnitude in the number of viruses reproducing.  That is why flu vaccines must constantly be re-formulated, to match the current strains of the disease in circulation. 

The evolution of viruses favors those which are most likely to infect additional victims.  Thus, infectious diseases tend to evolve to new forms that are more catching, and allow their victims to survive longer, infecting additional victims.  A virus which immediately kills its host is less likely to propagate than a virus which allows the host to linger.  Diseases evolve to new forms which are more infectious, but less deadly.  We can expect the same progression in Ebola, but to what degree and in what time frame are impossible to say.

From Extrapolation to Prediction
Throughout this post, I have been careful to use the word “extrapolation” rather than “forecast” or “prediction”.   The mathematical projection of a trend is a long way from the real world.  Still, I believe the extrapolation of the early trend of the Ebola epidemic shows what might happen, if it becomes a global pandemic.  I dislike alarmist or extremely dire warnings about social or environmental hazards, but in this case, the dire warning seems to be a direct result of objective analysis.

We tend to believe that such a horrific epidemic as Ebola can only happen in backwards and undeveloped places (except for movies about the zombie apocalypse).   We take comfort in our modern hospitals, our sanitation systems, our education and wealth.   There is a sense that “it can’t happen here.”  But I think this is misplaced over-confidence.  There have been very stringent efforts to control the disease in West Africa, which have been unsuccessful.  I do not think it would necessarily be easier to control an Ebola outbreak in New York City than in subsistence villages in West Africa.  I think the developed world should consider the risks and consequences of an Ebola outbreak, and make contingency plans accordingly. 

An uncontrolled Ebola outbreak in the developed world would have severe consequences.  Some breakdown of social order should be expected, and this breakdown might make medical response and containment more difficult, or impossible.  It might be difficult to keep medical teams in place, if there is substantial loss of life among those treating the disease.  Economic consequences would be considerable, and there would be collateral damage to quality of life. 

What I have tried to do here is show the mathematical possibility for a global Ebola pandemic within the next twelve to eighteen months.  It isn’t a lot of time.   There will not be time to develop vaccines or experimental drugs, or even to manufacture new drugs if a miracle treatment did exist.  The Ebola epidemic is moving very quickly. 

I do not believe that we will see one billion cases of Ebola within eighteen months.   But I think it is a possibility, unless the threat is met with serious counter-measures at the earliest possible time.   I do believe that the epidemic will pass the mark of one million cases in Africa, and will cause disruption to international travel for some time. 


As Nate Silver has written in “The Signal and the Noise”, the most difficult predictions to make are those which involve choices and public policy.  There is feedback between the prediction and public policy, which can change the conditions controlling the prediction.   In the case of predictions regarding public welfare, the very best predictions are those which are self-defeating.  When a prediction regarding a public hazard is met by a change in public policy, mitigating the hazard, it has been successful, even while the prediction itself is wrong.  

-----
December 17, 2014: 
The exponential growth rate of the Ebola epidemic continued for about two months after my original blog post.  The exponential trend was broken in mid-October, 2014, thanks to global relief efforts and effective public health programs in the affected countries.  Updates to my original charts can be found here:


-----------
Obsolete as of November 7, 2014, see latest post.

Update, October 31, 2014
Here are key charts from this post, with data from WHO updated through October 25.

In the October 29 report, WHO presents revised figures that add about 3700 cases to the previous total.  These cases were recognized through study of patient databases, and occurred throughout the epidemic period, and not only since October 22.  The additional cases return the cumulative case number to my original exponential extrapolation, first presented on August 26th.

It is uncertain whether the apparent flattening of the cumulative cases, observed through the month of October, is real or the result of under-reporting.  Case reporting is increasingly late, and WHO cites data missing for a number of dates.

I have now seen two anecdotal reports that give a more optimistic appraisal of the situation in Monrovia, indicating fewer patients are reporting to Ebola clinics, and fewer bodies are being collected from the city outside the clinics.  Authorities disagree on whether the drop in patients shows a real decline in the epidemic, or avoidance of the clinics.

Extrapolation to one million cases:
Extrapolation to one billion cases:
-------
Obsolete Updates
Update, October 10, 2014
Reported data from Liberia show a falling number of new cases; however, the WHO and CDC believe that the situation continues to deteriorate.   Since early September, official data from Liberia have been late, contradictory, and inconsistent.  WHO and CDC believe there is substantial under-reporting of new cases.  At best, there are only about 25% of the number of beds required in treatment centers.  After weeks of seeing patients turned away from treatment centers, it seems likely that families are now caring for victims at home, causing under-reporting of official cases -- and transmitting the disease to new victims.
The October 8th report from WHO bluntly states “Evidence obtained from responders and laboratory staff in the country indicates beyond doubt that there is widespread under-reporting of new cases, and that the situation in Liberia, and in Monrovia in particular, continues to deteriorate from week to week.”  The CDC estimates that there may be as many as 1.5 times as many unreported cases as reported cases. Needless to say, forecasting the growth of the epidemic will become very difficult if there are no reliable reports on the number of cases.
Update, October 27, 2014
Here are key charts from this post, with data from WHO updated through October 18.  The latest point is the first point to fall below my original extrapolation.

The trend of officially reported cases has flattened, showing a reduced rate of transmission.  But the trend must be taken with a grain of salt, considering anecdotal evidence for many unreported cases.
New case numbers from Liberia continue to be delivered much later than data from Guinea and Sierra Leone.  I am interpolating numbers from Guinea and Sierra Leone to obtain a consistent single reporting data for the epidemic.

I found one anecdotal report from Monrovia which is cautiously optimistic.   The report appeared on the website AllAfrica.com:

WHO continues to say that the situation is deteriorating in Liberia and Sierra Leone.
---------------
Updates with additional text can be found below.
Update #1:
I posted an update with text on September 15.  I tweaked the models and looked at some of the containment efforts and procedures.

Update #2:
My second update is located here:
This post compares the geography of populations at risk to the extrapolated cumulative cases.
The post also discusses the accuracy of the case count from Liberia, the number of beds needed in West Africa, and the trend of the mortality rate.
-----
References:
World Health Organization

Various News Sources

Wikipedia

Nate Silver, 2012,  The Signal and the Noise, Why so Many Predictions Fail, But Some Don't, Penguin Press, New York, 534 p.
-----
Copyright 2014, Doug Robbins
All or part of this post may be reproduced, provided credit is given to the author.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Hadley Cells, the Global Distribution of Deserts, and Climate Change

As a child, did you ever spin a globe as fast as possible, until all boundaries and outlines disappeared into a blur of color?   Do you remember what it looked like?
I’m talking about a physiographic globe, with grasslands and forests shown in shades of green, and deserts in a sandy yellow.  Did you notice, as the globe turned, that the deserts line up?   Spin the globe fast enough, and the yellow band across North Africa merges with Saudi Arabia and blends into the deserts of India, and after a pause, appears again as a yellow swath across Mexico.  In the Southern Hemisphere another yellow band appears, showing the deserts of Australia, Chile, and Namibia in a yellow blur.  The two bands are symmetrically equidistant from the equator.

Hadley Cells and Global Deserts

The deserts on earth are arranged by latitude, for good reason.   There is a tropical convection cell in the atmosphere, known as the Hadley cell, or Hadley circulation.  Warm air rises near the equator, spreads laterally, becomes cool and falls at around 30 degrees latitude, north and south.  As the warm air rises at the equator, it cools, dropping its moisture as rain.  Tropical rainforests are the result, circling the globe near the equator.   The air moves north and south to about 30 degrees of latitude and falls.  As the high-altitude cool air becomes warmer in the lower atmosphere, its relative humidity falls.  The descending air-mass is dry, and deserts circle the globe between 25 degrees and 30 degrees of latitude.
The rising and falling air, driven by the earth’s tropical heat engine and modified by the Coriolis effect, accounts for many of the wind patterns on earth.  The trade winds and the subtropical jet stream are due to Hadley circulation.
Of course, like all weather systems, Hadley cells are complex, and they are not the only variables determining climate in the low latitudes.  Air circulation patterns are modified by the distribution of land and oceans, mountains and ocean currents.  The Hadley cells themselves show seasonal, inter-annual, and decadal variation.  But the basic model is simple.  Hadley circulation is a major factor in determining whether land is moist, hospitable and productive, or dry, hostile and barren.

Hadley Cells and Climate Change

As greenhouse gases accumulate in the Earth’s atmosphere, more heat will be retained in equatorial regions, and tropical convection is expected to become stronger.  Modeling shows that the Hadley cell will become larger.  The region of falling, dry air is expected to move northward, driven by more vigorous convection currents in the tropics.   Observations confirm this expectation; studies indicate that the Hadley cell has expanded by 2 degrees to 5 degrees of latitude (140 to 340 miles).  The change is more than can be attributed to natural variability and the rate of change is faster than predicted by modeling.
The consequences of expanding Hadley circulation may be severe, particularly for the United States.   Climate forecasts for the years 2080 – 99 predict drought conditions in summer months over almost the entire country.  
Contributing to the problem will be abnormally high temperatures.  Agriculture is simply not able to adapt to the combination of pervasive drought and high temperatures.

In recent years, the American Southwest has already experienced severe drought, in a pattern that is disturbingly similar to the forecasts for the end of the century.   The following figures are the US drought monitor published by US department of agriculture in 2013 and 2014.  Drought has been persistent in the American Southwest since 2007.



In 2011, Texas experienced a severe drought that left insufficient grass in the entire state to support the population of horses.   The year was the driest on record.   Many horse owners, unable to afford the high cost of hay imported from other states, abandoned their horses, or put them down.  If I recall correctly, about 100,000 horses perished, about 1/10 of Texas' population of 1,000,000 horses.  Agriculture losses in Texas in 2011 were estimated at $5 billion, with indirect costs of another $3.5 billion.   The US Forest Service estimated that between 100 million and 500 million trees died due to the 2011 drought.
Agriculture is simply not able to adapt to the combination of pervasive drought and high temperatures.  We are dependent on agriculture to sustain our population, and agriculture depends upon rain.   In 2011, drought left insufficient fodder to feed the population of horses in Texas, and as a consequence, many horses died.  What will happen in the United States by the end of the century, if drought leaves insufficient food to feed our people?

I just read that the region around Sao Paulo, Brazil, recently suffered the driest rainy season in 84 years.   Sao Paulo is located at 23.4 degrees South Latitude, so this event is not correlated to expansion of the Hadley Cell, but might reflect a strengthening of the dry circulation.   The water reservoir which provides nearly 50% of the city's water is at only 11% of its normal capacity, and another reservoir which provides 20% of the city's water is at only 35% of capacity.  Conservation measures are in effect, but if drought becomes pervasive, in this place or any populated place, the consequences will be severe for the people living there.

Monitoring the Southern Hadley Cell

Global patterns of atmospheric CO2 movement provide a tool for monitoring change in the Hadley cell.   
Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere show a strong annual cycle, driven by seasonal plant growth and decay in the Northern Hemisphere.  The cycle is very strong in the Northern Hemisphere, reflecting the large land mass and the location of most human agriculture.  The annual cycle is weak in the Southern Hemisphere, and the seasonal cycle of the Northern Hemisphere persists to about 30 degrees South Latitude, the southern boundary of the Hadley Cell.

The atmosphere observatory on Kermadec Islands, Pacific Ocean, is located at South Latitude 29.20.   The observatory is on the southern cusp of the Hadley Cell.  The CO2 seasonal cycle is much noisier than most other CO2 observations around the globe.  Natural variations in air circulation produce variable mixing of the Northern and Southern cycles, resulting in the noisy curve. 
We can smooth the CO2 data from Kermadec Islands and Baring Head, New Zealand, using a 5 month rolling average.  Comparison shows that the two curves are of opposite polarity.  Kermadec Islands is in the influence the Hadley Cell, circulating air from the Northern Hemisphere.  The Kermadec CO2 curve shows the seasonal cycle of the Northern Hemisphere.  Baring Head, located about 1000 miles to the south, at 41.4 degrees South Latitude, carries the seasonal cycle of the Southern Hemisphere.   


It occurs to me that a group of CO2 observatories should be established between 30 degrees and 40 degrees South Latitude.  Continuous observations of CO2 concentration and isotopic composition would reveal the boundary of the Hadley Cell.  Over time, these observations might detect air from the Northern Hemisphere, and indicated by the Northern Hemisphere seasonal CO2 cycle.  Such observations could be useful in measuring and documenting the progress of one of the most serious threats due to climate change. 

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Ukraine – A Nation on the Edge, Update #2 – Differing Perspectives from East and West

The crisis in Ukraine has been the subject of two previous posts on this blog. 

Fifty years ago, as an eight-year old playing with older boys, I learned the name "Ukraine" in a board game called "Risk".  It was a war game, and the goal was global domination by building military empires.  The most important place on the map was Eastern Europe, stretching from the Barents Sea to the Middle East.   This large block, half the size of a continent, controlled the expansion of empires from east or west.  That crucial geopolitical place, the key to success in this boys' game, was given a single name: Ukraine.  (Strangely, the name of Russia did not exist on the map; perhaps this was some artifact of the cold war.  
Status of the Ukrainian Crisis

The Ukrainian crisis is unfolding with the inexorable logic of a slow-motion train wreck.  I wrote those words about a month ago, but failed to finish this post.    I originally wrote that outright war was unlikely…then still unlikely… and now would say increasingly likely.  Considerable violence will occur before the crisis is resolved. 

Russia has annexed Crimea, and cities of eastern Ukraine are in turmoil.  Separatists in these cities have created an ungovernable climate, using the same tactics used by rebels to overthrow President Yanukovich.  It is clear that Russian special forces are organizing the opposition, and performing the takeover of strategic infrastructure before handing control of these assets to local militias.

Perspectives on the Crisis

From the Russian perspective, the turmoil in Ukraine is a result of Western meddling.  Western interests attempted to pull Ukraine into the economic orbit of the European Union, and provoked a revolution, unseating a democratically elected president.   Further, Russia’s  annexation of Crimea is simply the settlement of a long-standing territorial dispute.  Most Russians of this generation regard Crimea as part of Russia, separated from Russia in 1958 by an arbitrary administrative act by Nikita Khrushchev.  In the post-war Soviet Union, Crimea was a popular resort destination for citizens of the Soviet Union.  Russians regard Crimea much as Americans would regard Florida.  It is a traditional resort and vacation land, a place of pleasant memories for today’s generation of Russians, their parents and grandparents.  

From the Western perspective, Russia’s actions are a war of territorial expansion, an unimaginable return to the predatory aggression of World War II.  Western diplomats regard Crimea is an integral part of Ukraine.  Ukraine’s border were established two generations ago, and guaranteed by a treaty in 1994.  In that treaty, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons, in exchange for the guarantee of security of its borders.

Each perception contains partial truth.   But reality goes beyond either perspective.   Western interests did provoke this crisis.   Europeans pursued economic integration with Ukraine, in a genuine, well-meaning attempt to improve the lives of people.   American diplomats promoted the Western-leaning opposition in a geo-political game of domination, and undermined the existing democratic government.  Russia, for its part, is over-reacting, to its own detriment.  Vladimir Putin is using this crisis to demonstrate that he has no tolerance of such interference in satellite countries.   Russia does not regard Ukraine as an equal sovereign state, but rather like a vassal, a little brother bound to Russia politically, economically, and militarily.  Russia will not tolerate the disloyalty and insubordination of Ukraine pursuing a different destiny.

When protests in Kiev reached a tipping point, Russia acted opportunistically, implementing a well-defined plan to dismember Ukraine.   After Russia annexed Crimea, the next steps were predestined.  Despite reassurances by Putin, diplomats and news media, Russia never intended to stop after the annexation of Crimea.  Crimea is dependent on the Ukrainian mainland for water, for power, and for natural gas.  To obtain a secure border for Russian territory, it was immediately necessary to control Kherson province.   And secure control of Kherson province requires control of the Black Sea coast, and the roads and infrastructure of eastern Ukraine.    At this point, Russia cannot back away.   Russia will continue its well-practiced process of local insurrection, military acquisition of strategic infrastructure and annexation until it has acquired all of Eastern Ukraine and the Black Sea coast to Moldova.  Russia's goals will be to obtain a secure border, separation of Russian-speaking regions from Ukraine, control of critical infrastructure, and ownership of prospective petroleum resources within Ukraine.   These petroleum resources exist in the Donets basin of Eastern Ukraine, and the offshore areas of the Black Sea.  The Black Sea coast of Ukraine is a highly prospective but mostly unexplored petroleum province.

Economic and Political Systems
Here’s my political theory. 

The political organization in a society must match the economic organization in that society.  Political structures which do not match the economic structure of the society are unstable, and will not endure.
When the economic unit consisted of a city and surrounding farmland, the political unit was the city-state.   As trading between cities increased, the level of political organization grew to principalities or small kingdoms.  Larger economies, such as ancient Egypt, carried correspondingly large political systems.  Empires sometimes arise as a result of aggressive leadership, but unless supported by widespread trade (e.g, the circum-Mediterranean trade of the Roman Empire), empires divide and die over the course of a few generations.   And so, the main political unit of the 20th century has been the nation-state.   In recent decades, the increasing scale of trade caused more consolidation.  The European Union represents the next scale of political organization, reflecting economic integration across an entire continent, spanning many nations, languages, and cultures.  North America is awkwardly adjusting to the integration of Mexican and American cultures.

The Soviet Union was perhaps the first economic super-state.  The Soviet economy spanned 15 countries, and was continent-wide in political and economic union.  But this first experiment as a super-state failed, due to the flawed paradigm of strong state control, micro-managed economic planning, single-party political rule, and disregard for human liberty. 

The conflict in Ukraine is a conflict at the border between two expanding economic systems, each striving to improve lives through improved efficiency and economic integration.  But for the people with the misfortune to live in this torn country, there is no benefit. 

Consequences
As usual, there will be no winners in this conflict.

Russia will consolidate its influence in Eastern Ukraine and the Black Sea coast; the only question is how much violence will occur.  Western Ukraine will adopt an economic alignment with the European Union.   The West will need to provide substantial economic support to Western Ukraine for many years.   The people living in the disputed territories will suffer from local conflict for years to come.   Russians living in other satellite countries may be subject to prejudice or expulsion, as the principle rationale for Russian incursions into Crimea, S. Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Eastern Ukraine is that Russians are living in these places, and need protection.  Satellite countries that wish to preserve their autonomy may decide to preempt this process by expelling ethnic Russians, as occurred in several former Soviet Republics, following the breakup of the Soviet Union.  Russia will see the departure of Western investment, jobs, and technology.  The Russian economic growth was already slowing before the Ukrainian crisis; economic sanctions are likely to push the economy into recession. 

Vladimir Putin’s vision of Russia is that of a self-contained and self-sufficient society.  But the world is moving toward greater economic integration.  Every industry is benefiting from innovation and investment that is only possible in a world without economic borders.  Russia is shutting the door to participation in that world.


Putin’s Russia would be the center of an economic and political super-state, along the lines of the Soviet Union.   But Putin’s Russia has not corrected the flaws of the Soviet system.  And Russia lacks the wealth and technology to create a 21st century super-state.  Because of these actions in Ukraine, I believe Russia will become less wealthy, less influential, and more politically unstable in the coming decades.

And the question remains whether the adults and political leaders of the 21st century can hold the lives of people and the prosperity of society in higher regard than boys playing a game of world domination, fighting for control of a piece of territory called Ukraine.